VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF LEARNING MOTIVATION INSTRUMENT (I-MABAR) STUDENTS IN ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID 19

  • Bachrizal Bakhtiar Mahasiswa
Keywords: Validity and reliability, learning motivation instrument, online

Abstract

This article aims to determine the validity of the construction and reliability of a learning motivation instrument (I-MABAR) of students in the time of covid pandemic 19. Researchers used a pilot study on 36 students of Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) as a sample to obtain reliability, and three supervisors to obtain validity. Researchers have developed a questionnaire with a google form that contains a total of 24 items. Student learning motivation should be measured to ensure the level of student learning motivation in the learning process in the current Covid-19 dememic. For that, there needs to be a learning motivation instrument that has a good degree of validity and reliability to get the right display of student learning motivation. The findings of the study show that 24 instrument items from the five main constructs of I-MABAR have a very high total item correlation value. However, there are two total instrument items that have a strong correlation value namely items D3 and E1. But all items have an acceptable validity value. While the findings of reliability values ​​using Cronbach Alpha analysis have a very high value. Thus, the validity and reliability of the instrument shows that the student learning motivation instrument (I-MABAR) has a quality that can be used to measure learning motivation.

References

Alessandro, B. (2018). Digital Skills and Competence, and Digital and Online Learning. Turin: European Training Foundation.

Almeida, F., & Simoes, J. (2019). The Role of Serious Games, Gamification and Industry 4.0 Tools in the Education 4.0 Paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554469.

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.

Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating Students to Learn (3th Ed). Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Crews, J., & Parker, J. (2017). The Cambodian Experience: Exploring University Students’ Perspectives for Online Learning. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 697–719.

Denker, K. J. (2013). Student Response Systems and Facilitating the Large Lecture Basic Communication Course: Assessing Engagement and Learning. Communication Teacher, 27(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2012.730622.

Dhull, I., & Sakshi. (2017). Online Learning. International Education & Research Journal (IERJ), 3(8), 32–34.

Gamar, M. M., Al Faruq, M. S., & Lina, L. (2018). Challenging the Indonesian Primary Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. 3rd International Conference on Education Management and Administration (CoEMA 2018), 269, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-18.2018.12.

Hamzah B. Uno. (2009). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effects of E-learning on Students’ Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.905.

Husaini, M. (2014). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Bidang Pendidikan (EEducation). Jurnal Mikrotik, 2(1), 1–5.

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. Spinger.

Lee, J., & Martin, L. (2017). Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Motivating Factors of Online Class Discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2883.

Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184

Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.-Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a Social and Motivational Framework for Understanding Satisfaction in Online Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.1.a.

Mather, M., & Sarkans, A. (2018). Student Perceptions of Online and Face-to-Face Learning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 61–76.

Mustofa, M. I., Chodzirin, M., Sayekti, L., & Fauzan, R. (2019). Formulasi Model Perkuliahan Daring sebagai Upaya Menekan Disparitas Kualitas Perguruan Tinggi. Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 1(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2019.1.2.4067.

Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2014). Impact of Learner’s Characteristics and Learning Behaviour on Learning Performance during a Fully Online Course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 12(4), 394–408. www.ejel.org.

Ni Putu Aprilia Krismony, Desak P. P.& I Gusti N. J., (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru Volume 3 Nomor 2 2020, pp 249-257

Orgaz, F., Moral, S., & Domínguez, C. (2018). Student’s Attitude and Perception with the Use of Technology in the University. Journal of Educational Psychology – Propositos Y Representaciones, 6(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2018.v6n2.230.

Pilkington, O. A. (2018). Active Learning for an Online Composition Classroom: Blogging as an Enhancement of Online Curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518788278.

Riaz, A. (2018). Effects of Online Education on Encoding and Decoding Process of Students and Teachers. International Conference E-Learning, 42–48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590288.pdf.

Sahu, P. (2020). Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff. Cureus, 2019(April). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541.

Sagitasari, D. A. (2010). Hubungan Antara Kreativitas dan Gaya Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, (September), 174.

Samir Abou El-Seoud, M., Taj-Eddin, I. A. T. F., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M. M., & Nosseir, A. (2014). E-learning and Students’ Motivation: A Research Study on the Effect of Elearning on Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i4.3465.

Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (4th Ed). Pearson.

Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation the Oxford handbook of Human Motivation (In RM Ryan). Oxford University Press.

Selvi, K. (2010). Motivating Factors in Online Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.110.

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893.

Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—Predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035.

Winda Ardyani, Aryo Andri Nugroho, Ali Shodiqin (2020). Instrumen angket gaya belajar visual, auditorial dan kinestetik untuk siswa SMP: validitas dan reliabilitas.

Zhou, G., Chen, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Back to the Spring of Wuhan: Facts and Hope of COVID-19 Outbreak. Frontiers of Medicine, 14(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0758-9.

Published
2022-01-15
How to Cite
Bakhtiar, B. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF LEARNING MOTIVATION INSTRUMENT (I-MABAR) STUDENTS IN ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID 19. OISAA Journal of Indonesia Emas, 5(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.52162/jie.2022.005.01.2
Section
Articles