FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF CATENARY MOORING SYSTEM DUE TO HARSH ENVIRONMENT IN FOLLOWING SEAS

  • Fuad Mahfud Assidiq Hasanuddin University
Keywords: Catenary, Fatigue Life, Following Seas, FPU, SLFR

Abstract

In the operation, Floating Production Unit (FPU) will get dynamic loads on the structure periodically
such as the mooring line responses. The aim of the present study to discuss fatigue life on catenary
mooring system refers to the comparison of using or without using the Single Line Freestanding Riser
(SLFR), the operational design and installation conditions at FPU Gendalo-Gehem and located in the
Makassar Strait using the six-strand wire rope with 0,115 meters outer diameter and 1.200 meters length
will be fatigue life analysed. The FPU motion observation shows the highest Response Amplitude
Operator (RAO) surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch, and yaw motion due to harsh environments are 0,615
m/m, 1,01x10-6 m/m, 1,048 m/m, 1,14x10-5 0/m, 2,23 0/m, and 9,08x10-8 0/m. It means that the
amplitude response will always be smaller than the wave amplitude coming up. Taking into RAO
motion calculation, the fatigue life on catenary mooring systems for following seas are 445 years in
mooring line 1 and mooring line 8 with using SLFR while without using SLFR for 5.461 years in
mooring line 1. The structure is still in safe condition because of the design safety factor about 300
years.

References

API RP 2 RD, 1998. Design of Risers for Floating Production Systems (FPSs) and Tension-Leg
Platforms (TLPs). USA: American Petroleum Institute.
API RP 2 SK, 2005. Recommended Practice for Design and Analysis of Station Keeping Systems for
Floating Structures. USA: American Petroleum Institute.
Bannantine A.J., Comer J.J., Handrock L.J., 1990. Fundamental of Metal Fatigue Analysis. USA:
Prentice Hall.
Chakrabarti, S.,K., 1987. Hydrodynamic of Offshore Structures. USA: Computational Mechanic
Publication Southampton.
Chrolenko, M. O., 2013. Dynamic Analysis and Design of Mooring Lines. Norway: NTNU.
DNV OS E301, 2004. Position Mooring. Norway: Det Norske Veritas.
DNV OS E304, 2015. Offshore Mooring Steel Wire Ropes. Norway: Det Norske Veritas .
Faltinsen O. M, 2005. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Larsen K, 2014. Lecture Note: Mooring and Station Keeping of Floating Structures. Norway: NTNU.
Larsen C.M, Svein Saevik, Jacob Qvist, 2014. Handbook on Design and Operation of Flexible Pipes;
B1 Design Analysis. Norway: MARINTEK / NTNU / 4Subsea.
Nallayarasu, 2015. Offshore Structures Analysis and Design. India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Nugteren F., 2015. Flexible Riser Fatigue Analysis: Studying Conservatism in Flexible Riser Fatigue
Analysis and Development of an Engineering Model to Study Influencing Parameters of Local
Wire Stress. Master of Science Thesis. Netherlands: TU Delft.
Saidee, 2015. Fatigue Analysis and Design of Mooring Systems: Assessment and Comparison of
Different Methods. Master of Science Thesis. Norway: NTNU.
Sun, J. W., Wang, S. Q, 2010. Study on Motion Performance of Deepwater Spar Platform under
Different Mooring Methods. China: Period of Ocean University of China.
Vryh of Anchors BV, 2010. Anchor Manual: The Guide Anchoring. Netherlands: Capelle a/d Yssel.
Published
2018-03-01
How to Cite
Assidiq, F. M. (2018). FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF CATENARY MOORING SYSTEM DUE TO HARSH ENVIRONMENT IN FOLLOWING SEAS. OISAA Journal of Indonesia Emas, 1(1), 51-68. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ppi.id/index.php/oisaa/article/view/80
Section
Articles